'Abdur-Rahmaan ibn Mahdee (rahima-hullaah) mentions:

We were with Maalik Ibn Anas when a man came saying:

((O Abu ’Abdullaah, I have travelled a distance of six months. The people of my land sent me to ask you about a matter)).

So he said:

((Ask!))

So the man asked him some things, so he replied:

((I do not know))

...and the man thought he had come to someone who knew everything, so he said:

((What shall I tell the people of my land when I return to them?))

He said:

((Say to them: Maalik Ibn Anas does not know)).

Ref: Fatwa-Online

 

Abu Muhammad Abdullaah ibn Abee Zayd al-Qayruwaanee said:

"He replied: that such an act is considered Makruh [reprehensible] if there is somebody inside [present in] the Masjid, praying Salaah, because that person will get distracted by the loud recitation."

Ref: Reciting the Qur`an in a loud tone inside the Masjid

 

 

Who Was Intended by "The Bayaan"

Shaykh Khaalid ar-Raddaadee

Reference: Audio Tape: A Warning Against Extremism. Feb-25-2005

Category: Methodology

In relation to the previous lecture, I was asked a question which is constantly being brought up and repeated, and I have answered it in the previous [lecture] so now I will increase that answer in clarity:

The question is about The "Bayaan" that was issued by some of the Mashaaykh, Shaykh Muhhamad ibn Haadee, Shaykh ‘Abdullaah al Bukharee (حفظهما الله) as well as myself in relation to a general advice given to the students of the Islaamic University of Al Madeenah An Nabaweeyah. And it was an advice in warning against Ghuloo (extremism), just as it was an advice in unifying the ranks and in staying far away from everything that causes splitting and differing and Allaah, ‘Aza wa Jal has caused a lot of benefit through it.

The question was:

Were there some specific individuals intended? Or were there some individuals in Britain like Salafi Publications or other than them here [in Madeenah] intended by this Bayaan?

So we have always answered in the same way and repeated that the Bayaan does not intend a Jamaa’ah [group]. But indeed there were certain individuals who fell into something of Ghuloo (extremism) and Shatat (excessiveness), who were intended by this Bayaan, here [in Madeenah] and over there [in Britain]. These individuals made certain statements and displayed a type of conduct that harmed not only themselves, but also their brothers and likewise the Salafee Da’wah.

This is why this Bayaan came out, after we gathered with the students and attempted to unify them, rectify that which had occurred between them and bring them closer together. [Therefore], this Bayaan serves as an affirmation to what we had already clarified [in that sitting 1422-1424 H/ Corresponding to May 2003]. The Bayaan intended certain individuals who fell into something of Ghuloo and Shatat and made certain statements or harmed their brothers, from both sides; this is why the Bayaan came about.

And now we reaffirm this once more, because a lot of questions have emerged about this Bayaan, and perhaps that which was mentioned previously both the first and second times was sufficient, and what we have mentioned tonight should also be sufficient and Allaah is the granter of success.

Also, in continuation to [what has already been mentioned], there were some statements and a certain type of conduct that caused the likes of this Bayaan to come out to begin with. There was a certain type of conduct as well as principals that were Ghareeb (strange) and ‘Ajeeb (absurd) , and al hamdulilaah many individuals have returned [to the truth] from this[conduct and those principals].

From amongst these strange and absurd principals; was that individuals would be hasty in boycotting people without giving advice, and taking people by surprise/hastily with mere assumptions and without Tathabut (making sure that these assumptions are true).

Also [from amongst those principals was]: Splitting people into ‘clear and unclear Salafees’, and the likes of these statements.

Likewise: there were extreme principals that followed this later on, such as :’It is permissible for anyone to speak about people and warn against them’.

This issue of applying Jarh upon the narrators or those who are involved with [giving] knowledge is an issue that none but the people of knowledge and acquaintance [with these issues] are qualified to speak about. This is why the only people who have written in these issues are those that are well known for their acquaintance as well as being well acknowledged Imaams who have spent a lot of time and effort in getting acquainted with the Rijaal (narrators), adhering to the Sunnah as well as being very precise/accurate in their statements.

This is why these strange and absurd principals emerged, and long disputes between the students occurred because of these principals, which in turn caused separation and Wahshah (isolation). Those who were behind these principals wa lilaahil hamd, returned [to the truth] and a lot of the brothers proclaimed that they had an incorrect understanding of these issues, and this is good, because to admit to ones mistakes is a Fadeelah (praiseworthy). The believer whenever he is reminded, benefits from this reminder and returns [to the truth]. As for the one who argues, disputes and stubbornly rejects the truth, then this one only loves to elevate/give victory to himself, and from Allaah alone do we seek refuge.

The Salafee student of knowledge, one who adheres to the Sunnah, is one who always returns to the truth, he revolves around the truth wherever it may be and follows the proofs. This does not decrease him in status at all: That he says something, and later his mistake becomes clear to him, so he retracts his statement, and he makes this retraction publicly and honestly. Rather this only increases him in status, as the Messenger of Allaah said:

“No one humbles himself for [the pleasure of] Allaah except that He [Allaah] raises him.”

Translator: Nadir Ahmad, Abu Abdul-Waahid

Date Published: Friday, 11 March 2005

This article has been read 10,893 times

Print this article

This article has been published with the permission of the translator, who affirms the accuracy of his translation of this article as well as the authenticity of the original Arabic source. Should you have any comment(s) and/or correction(s) to suggest, please write to us at:

...and your email will be passed on to him, inshaa.-Allaah.

 


 

من المراد بالبيان

الشيخ خالد الردادي

ÇáãÑÌÚ: شريط التحذير من الإرهاب - تاريخ 25/02/2005

ÇáÈÇÈ: المنهج

بخصوص المحاضرة السابقة، سئلت سؤالاً،وهذا السؤال كرر كثيراُ. وقد أجبت عليه فيما مضى، فنزيده الان توضيحاً. والسؤال هو عن البيان الذى خرج من المشايخ: الشيخ محمد هادى، والشيخ عبد الله عبد الرحيم، حفظهم الله، ومعهم انا، بخصوص نصيحه عامه للاخوة الطلاب بالجامعة الاسلامية بالمدينة النبوية، وهى نصيحة فى التحذير من الغلو، وهى كلمة كذلك فى الاجتماع ووحدة الصف ،والبعد عما يسبب الفرقة والخلاف،وقد نفع الله عز وجل بها. كان السؤال هل يقصد بذلك البيان بعض الاخوة، او بعض من في بريطانيا،كالمكتبة السلفية وغيرها من الاخوة هنا؟ فقلنا دائما وكررنا ان البيان لا يقصد به جماعة،وانما يقصد به افراداً قد حصل منهم شئ من الغلو والشطط،من هنا وهناك.وحصلت منهم عبارات وتصرفات اساءت لهم،ولاخوانهم،وللدعوة السلفية.ولذلك جاء هذا البيان بعد ان اجتمعنا بهم وحاولنا التأليف والتقريب بينهم،والاصلاح فيما بينهم. فكان هذا البيان تاكيد لما سبق ان وضحناه،وان هذا البيان يقصد به افراد حصل منهم شئاً من الغلو،والشطط،والالفاظ،او ايذاء اخوانهم من كلا الطرفين.ولذلك خرج البيان.نؤكد ذلك مرة اخرى بهذه الكلمة،لانه كثر السؤال و التشغيب حول هذا البيان، ولعله فيما ذكر اولاً وثانيا كفاية،وما ذكرناه هذه الليلة يكفى والله الموفق. كانت هناك بعض المقولات،وبعض التصرفات،هى التى استدعت خروج مثل هذه الكلمة والبيان،لان هناك تصرفات،وتاصيلات،غريبة وعجيبة، حصلت.والحمد لله انه قد تراجع عنها كثير من الاخوة. من هذه التاصيلات الغريبة،العجيبة التى كانت فيها التعجل فى هجرالناس من دون نصح،او بيان.واخذ الناس تعجلاً، بالظنون،ومن غير تثبت.وكذلك ايضاً،تقسيم الناس الى سلفى واضح،وغير واضح،ومثل هذه العبارات. وكذلك ايضاً تاصيلات تبعتها فيما بعد من التفريط،انه يجوز لاى احد انه يتكلم فى الاشخاص،ويحذر منهم.وباب جرح الرواة،او جرح من تصدى للعلم،هذا لا يقوم به الا اهل العلم. يعنى الدراى.وكذلك لم يدخل فيه الا من عرف بالدراى، وشهد له بالامامة،وطول الباع فى معرفة الرجال،ولزوم السنة،والفصل فى القول.ولذلك صدرت بعض هذه التاصيلات الغريبة، والعجيبة.وحصل نزاع طويل بين بعض الاخوة بسببها، مما سبب فرقة،ووحشة.وقد كان وراءها من وراءها- ولله الحمد- تراجع واعلن كثير من الاخوة انهم كانوا مخظئين فى فهم مثل هذه الامور،- وهذا خير- فان الاعتراف بالذنب فضيلة، والمؤمن متى ما ذكر ذكر،ورجع،واما المجادل، والمخاصم،والمعاند،فهذا - والعياذ بالله- يحب الانتصار لنفسه. طالب العلم،السلفى،صاحب السنة،رجاع الى الحق.يدور مع الحق حيث وجد،ويتبع الدليل ولا ينقص من مكانته،ومنزلته شيئاً. ان يقول بقول ثم يتبين له خطاؤه فيه، ان يتراجع ويعلنها صريحه.بل هذا يرفع من مكانته،ويزيده رفعةً،كما قال عليه الصلاة والسلام: “ وما تواضع احد لله الا رفعه” والله الموفق

ÇáãÊÑÌã: أبو عبد الواحد نادر أحمد

 

The Advice of the Salaf Regarding the Early Upbringing of the Child - 2

فصل في رياضة الصبيان في أول النشوء - الجزء الثاني

Prohibitive Speech During the Day in Ramadhaan

التحدث بكلام حرام في نهار رمضان

The Advice of the Salaf Regarding the Early Upbringing of the Child - 1

فصل في رياضة الصبيان في أول النشوء - الجزء الأول

Beware of this Path O Servant of Allaah - 2

فاحذر يا عبد الله من هذا المسلك – 2

Beware of this Path O Servant of Allaah - 1

فاحذر يا عبد الله من هذا المسلك – 1

Two Waves That Have Struck the Salafee Da'wah

نصيحة الشيخ ربيع للسلفيين في فرنسا

The Root Causes Behind the Excessive Differing between Ahlus-Sunnah

الأسباب التي تؤدي إلى فشو الاختلاف

Dealings with Hizbees in Worldly Affairs

التعامل مع الحزبيين في أمور الدنيا

Who is Abu ‘Abdur Rahman Muhammad ‘Ajaal?

The Loss of a Husband

Removing the Doubts of the Sufi Movement - Series 1

Confusion about Voting?

 

use this banner to link to us