|
| |
Shaykh Ismaa`eel al-`Adawee said:
"A lot of times this is driven by the hidden desire; it is the love of fame, being at the forefront and assuming positions of leadership, which drives them to wage war against everyone who may lower their public reputation, their leadership or invalidate it, they battle whether it is with the truth or falsehood.
Adhering to the truth and acting upon it fades away while they battle to attain their benefits and desires, being obstinate with falsehood, as is the case with people of innovations in their reactions with the people of rectification, the Mujadidoon (revivers) of the religion, the scholars who act upon their knowledge."
Ref: The Root Causes Behind the Excessive Differing between Ahlus-Sunnah
|
| |
Shaykh Waseeullaah `Abbaas said:
"From amongst what distinguishes them particularly since their target audience is English speakers is that they present the material in both Arabic and English, so that they are not accused of twisting the meanings of the translated texts, so may Allah reward them with good."
Ref: Shaykh Waseeullaah 'Abbaas's Recommendation for Madeenah.com
|
|
|
 |
Reference: Refer to attached audio file |
O esteemed Shaykh, what are the rules of boycotting and disputation between a Muslim and his fellow brother when they do not differ in the (main) religious issues, but rather, they only differ in some of the subsidiary branches?
If boycotting between the Believers is due to sins, then it is to be performed when there is a perceived benefit to be derived from the boycotting itself. For example, it is hoped that by way of the boycotting, that particular individual will stop committing the sin concerned, or that he will refrain from being in opposition to the Religion.
However, if there is no perceived benefit, or if by way of boycotting that person, it will merely increase him in sin or in his disobedience to the Religion, then in this case, the person should not be boycotted. Rather, he is to be advised and should not be boycotted.
Also, if the boycotting is performed for personal or worldly reasons, then it is not appropriate. However, the Prophet (sallAllahu alayhi wa sallam) did allow this to be done for up to 3 days only. So if it is a must, then that person should only be boycotted for up to 3 days; however, this is merely an allowance permitted by the Religion. Nevertheless, the better stance is that a person should not be boycotted for worldly motives. But again, if it reaches the extent that a person feels compelled to do so, then the boycotting should be done according to the legislated boundaries set by the Religion which is up to 3 days. The proof for this is the saying of the Prophet (sallAlllahu alayhi wa sallam):
((It is not permissible for a Muslim to boycott his fellow Muslim brother for more than 3 days)).[1]
This Hadeeth is concerning worldly motives or for personal inner-feelings that may somewhat need to be fulfilled.
However, if the boycotting is to be performed on behalf of the Religion, (i.e. for religious reasons), then it is to be performed in accordance with the aforementioned details (such as) if there is benefit to be derived from the boycotting, there is advice and reprimand, then the person is to be boycotted.
However, if boycotting results in a greater harm and causes the one boycotted to increase in his evil, then in this circumstance, this person is not to be boycotted and neither is it permissible to do so. Nam.
Allah knows best and may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon His Prophet Muhammad.
Footnotes:
[1] Saheeh Muslim, Kitaab al-Adab wal Birr, Hadeeth No: 6478
 |
Date Published: Friday 01 July, 2011 |
 |
Print this article |
|
 |
This article has been published with the permission of the translator, who affirms the accuracy of his translation of this article as well as the authenticity of the original Arabic source. Should you have any comment(s) and/or correction(s) to suggest, please write to us at:
...and your email will be passed on to him, inshaa.-Allaah. |
ÇáãÑÌÚ: ???? ????? ?????? |
|
|
|
