The Wise Imaam

Take for example, the Imaam (rahima-hullaah) would [take to account and] punish those who smoked [tobacco] – [this was at the time] when [smoking] first appeared [in the Arabian Peninsula] – about 250 years ago; So he would reprimand and censure whoever smoked, so that [this evil habit] does not spread amongst the masses.

On one [particular] occasion [at the time], he gathered a number of the tribes – between whom there had occurred [some] trials and tribulations, quite possibly resulting in killings. So the leaders of these Bedouin tribes were invited to ad-Dar’iyyah and al-Imaam Muhammad ibn ‘Abdil-Wahhaab spoke to them [all], and implored them to stop the bloodshed, and seek to rectify [the affairs] between them – [something] which they [subsequently] adhered to.

[At the time of prayer] whilst one of the tribal leaders was praying, a smoker’s pipe fell [from his pocket], and [some of] the people saw it, and [rushed to] inform the Imaam, saying: “He just picked up his pipe and put it [back] in his pocket, [surely] he should be censured…this [pipe] is indicative [of him being a smoker], how can you withhold from censuring and reprimanding him?” Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Abdil-Wahhaab said [to them]: “We did not see anything.” They replied: “We saw it O Shaykh!” He persisted: “We did not see anything.” [And] so he left the tribal leader [alone] and did not say a thing to him, instead anticipating [Allaah’s] guidance [for him].

[Notice] the [critical, yet delicate] circumstances surrounding this tribal leader; Had he been in any other situation he would certainly have been censured and reprimanded. However, as he was in this [critical, yet delicate] situation, the [wise and] reformist Imaam commented: “Because of the bloodshed [that is occurring], it is not appropriate [to censure him] now, until such time this killing stops.” [As a result] he was of the opinion not to censure and reprimand the tribal leader for smoking, because this is not from the [defining and befitting] actions of the Imaams, nor from the [defining and befitting] actions of those who [thoroughly] understand the purport and intent behind the Sharee’ah legislation in [all] affairs.

So the da’wah [of tawheed] has not varied in its application from the early scholars of the first Saudi State (1744-1818), and nor from the second Saudi State (1824-1891), and nor from the third Saudi State (1924-present day); So it [remains] one institute of knowledge and learning. However, the general attainment of benefit [as opposed to harm] is [always] sought. [The reason being] because the [wise and] reformist Imaam adapted his approach [to the circumstances he faced] – and we [here in Saudi Arabia] have not adopted this approach out of blindly following him, rather because the general attainment of legislated benefit dictates this. And so, as we have said [before], the Imaams of the da’wah [of tawheed] after him have remained clear and apparent [in their approach], in accordance with that which the legislated commands and applicable evidences dictate.

He is a graduate of the Islaamic University of Madeenah, having graduated from the Institute of Arabic Language, and later the Faculty of Sharee'ah in 2004. He currently resides in Birmingham, UK.

Related posts

Leave a Reply